Viola bicolor/Viola rafinesquei (American Field Pansy, ETC.)

Viola bicolor/Viola rafinesquei (American Field Pansy) on 4-11-20, #686-73.

American Field Pansy, Field Pansy, Wild Pansy, Johnny Jump Up

Viola bicolor

vy (VYE)-OH-la  BY-kul-ur

OR

Viola rafinesquei

vy (VYE)-OH-la  raf-in-ess-kee-eye (?)

Synonyms of Viola bicolor/rafinesquei (9) (Updated on 1-18-23 from Plants of the World Online): Mnemion rafinesquei (Greene) Nieuwl., Mnemion tenellum Webb, Viola bicolor Pursh, Viola kitaibeliana var. rafinesquei (Greene) Fernald, Viola rafinesquei f. caerulea Moldenke, Viola rafinesquei f. minor Moldenke, Viola tenella Raf. Of course, Viola bicolor Pursh or Viola rafinesque Greene, depending on which accepted species you decide to go with. One of the other will be a synonym…  

Most websites and databases list Viola bicolor Pursh as the accepted scientific name. It was named and described as such by Frederick Traugott Pursh in Flora Americae Septentrionalis in 1813. To view this description on page 175 in Flora Americae Septentrionalis via BHL click HERE.

Plants of the World Online uses Viola rafinesquei Greene as the accepted scientific name for the American Field Pansy. It was named and described as such by Edward Lee Greene in Pittonia in 1899. You can click HERE to read Mr. Greene’s original description on page 9 in Pittonia via BHL (Bioheritage Library). Ummm… The whole write-up by Green is hard to understand…  

Anyway, I am not a botanist, so I am not going to choose sides on this one or vive my opinion. If I were a betting man, I would pass on this one… Of course, if you go by date, Viola bicolor Pursch would win the prize. But, the name Viola bicolor had been used as far back as 1782. Kind of like Viola tricolor… Multiple names for the same or different species over and over multiple times. What was bicolor for one was tricolor for another, and visa versa, not to mention other names for the same species. I always assume Plants of the World Online is the most up-to-date database, and “usually” other sites say the same. This is one time they are different. Perhaps POWO has their own reason other than the date published. Hmmm… 

The genus, Viola L., was named and described as such by Carl von Linnaeus in the second volume of the first edition of Species Plantarum in 1753.

As of 1-18-23 when this page was last updated, Plants of the World Online lists 663 species in the Viola genus. It is a member of the plant family Violaceae with a total of 24 genera. Those numbers could change as updates are made on POWO.

Distribution map of Viola rafinesquei from Plants of the World Online. Facilitated by the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. Published on the Internet; http://www.plantsoftheworldonline.org/. Retrieved on December 19, 2021.

The above distribution map for Viola bicolor/rafinesquei is from Plants of the World Online. Areas in green are where the species is native. Other maps for Viola bicolor normally show Idaho as well. The map on the USDA Plants Database for Viola bicolor also shows a broader range in Canada. No maps are perfect and many use out-of-date data. 

The map on iNaturalist (for Viola bicolor) shows where members have made observations. Anyone can join and it is a great website to confirm and share your observations. The maps on iNaturalist are continually updated as members post new observations.

THERE ARE SEVERAL LINKS AT THE BOTTOM OF THE PAGE FOR FURTHER READING AND TO HELP WITH A BETTER POSITIVE ID.

Viola bicolor/Viola rafinesquei (American Field Pansy) on 4-11-20, #686-74.

I found this Viola species in 2020 in an area where hay had been previously stored. I identified it as Viola bicolor and it became Research Grade on iNaturalist. The leaves and flowers match Viola bicolor Pursh on Missouri Plants so they were a deciding feature. Then, when I wrote this page, I saw where Plants of the World Online listed three different Viola bicolor named by three different botanists. The one here, Viola bicolor Pursh is listed as a synonym of Viola rafinesquei Greene, Viola bicolor Hoffm. became a synonym of Viola tricolor L., and Viola bicolor Reiche became a synonym of Viola montagnei Gay. The problem is, all species are quite similar and sometimes Viola tricolor produces bi-colored flowers. I had intended to get more close-up shots of the flowers but my camera had been acting up as time went by. It was too late to take more photos by the time I bought a new camera. Missouri Plants says Viola tricolor is rare in Missouri. OH, Viola bicolor/V. rafinesquei is a North American native, while Viola tricolor is an introduced species, and Viola montagnei is only found in Chili and Argentina in South America.

I don’t know much about this species and haven’t found it anywhere since 2020. It is common throughout Missouri and the eastern part of North America. It may be found in isolated areas in many of the states shown on the map. 

Viola bicolor/Viola rafinesquei (American Field Pansy) on 4-11-20, #686-75.

The species is easily identified based on the appearance of its leaves and deeply lobed stipules. Where other viola species on the farm prefer areas in shadier locations and loamy soil, this one likes full to part sun and more sandy soil. The others are perennial, while this species is a winter or spring annual…

Viola bicolor/Viola rafinesquei (American Field Pansy) on 4-11-20, #686-76.

I really need to find this species and take more photos before writing descriptions, but I will give it a shot. Viola bicolor/rafinesquei grows both basal and alternate leaves and also has large stipules. I say large, but that is in contrast to the small leaves. The green to purplish basal leaves are kind of odd with long flattish petioles (leaf stems), more like a spatulate leaf shape with a round tip. The circular tip has a few somewhat rounded to pointed teeth. The basal leaves are arranged in somewhat of a rosette around the bottom of the plant. Alternate leaves grow from the stems and are similar but smaller than the basal leaves.

Viola bicolor/Viola rafinesquei (American Field Pansy) on 4-11-20, #686-77.

It’s the leaf-like stipules that seem to get most of the attention. They grow from the axils of the leaves, are approximately 1” long, and are deeply lobed.

Viola bicolor/Viola rafinesquei (American Field Pansy) on 4-11-20, #686-78.

The single flowers emerge at the tip of long petioles from leaf axils of upper leaves. The hairless petioles can be light green to purplish and have a curve at the apices just before the flower. The flowers have 5 petals and 5 sepals are are approximately 2” across. The petals are normally light bluish violet becoming white near the throat. The two lateral petals have white beards near the throat and the lower petal has a yellow spot. The lower petal has darker stripes while the stripes on the lateral aren’t quite as dark. Flower color is variable, and even white flowers with a slight tint are not uncommon. Oh, the lower petals are somewhat lobed and can appear to be two petals instead of one.

Viola bicolor/V. rafinesquei is the only annual Viola sp. that produces cleistogamous (self fertile) flowers, but the Missouri Plants website says they are rarely produced in Missouri. Flowers are produced March through May while cleistogamous flowers are produced later in the season.

Fertilized flowers produce a small ellipsoid seed capsule that is enclosed with persistent sepals. Upon drying, the capsule splits open and the seeds are ejected.

Bees and sometimes small butterflies and skippers eat the pollen and nectar of the flowers. Caterpillars of Fritillary butterflies feed on the leaves. 

I need to check the area where the photos were taken and see if I can find them again…

I have enjoyed photographing and learning about the many wildflowers growing on the family farm and in other areas. The farm is in Windsor, Missouri in Pettis County (Henry County is across the street, and Benton and Johnson aren’t far away). I have grown over 500 different plants and identified over 250 species of wildflowers (most have pages listed on the right side of the page). I am not an expert, botanist, or horticulturalist. I just like growing, photographing, and writing about my experience. I rely on several websites for ID and a few horticulturalists I contact if I cannot figure them out. Wildflowers can be somewhat variable from location to location, so sometimes it gets a bit confusing. If you see I have made an error, please let me know so I can correct what I have written.

I hope you found this page useful and be sure to check the links below for more information. They were written by experts and provide much more information. Some sites may not be up-to-date but they are always a work in progress. If you can, I would appreciate it if you would click on the “Like” below and leave a comment. It helps us bloggers stay motivated. You can also send an email to me at thebelmontrooster@yahoo.com. I would enjoy hearing from you especially if you notice something is a bit whacky.

FOR FURTHER READING:
PLANTS OF THE WORLD ONLINE (GENUS/SPECIES)
INTERNATIONAL PLANT NAMES INDEX
(Viola/V. bicolor Pursh/V. rafinesquei Greene)
TROPICOS (GENUS/V. bicolor/V. rafinesquei)
FLORA OF MISSOURI (GENUS/V. bicolor)

FLORA OF NORTH AMERICA (GENUS/SPECIES)
WORLD FLORA ONLINE (GENUS/SPECIES)
JUSTOR
WIKIPEDIA (GENUS/V. bicolor)
USDA PLANTS DATABASE
DAVE’S GARDEN
DAVE’S GARDEN-ARTICLE
MISSOURI PLANTS
MSU-MIDWEST WEEDS AND WILDFLOWERS
UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-WEED ID GUIDE
iNATURALIST
WILDFLOWER SEARCH
ILLINOIS WILDFLOWERS
KANSAS WILDFLOWERS AND GRASSES
NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY
LADY BIRD JOHNSON WILDFLOWER CENTER
MARYLAND BIODIVERSITY PROJECT
NATIVE PLANTS OF THE CAROLINAS AND GEORGIA
BACKYARD NATURE
U.S. WILDFLOWERS
NATURESERVE EXPLORER
THE PRARIE ECOLOGIST
EAT THE WEEDS

NOTE: The data (figures, maps, accepted names, etc.) may not match on these websites. It depends on when and how they make updates and when their sources make updates. Some websites have hundreds and even many thousands of species to keep up with. Accepted scientific names change periodically and it can be hard to keep with as well. Some of the links may use a name that is a synonym on other sites. In my opinion, Plants of the World Online by Kew is the most reliable and up-to-date plant database and they make updates on a regular basis. I make updates “at least” once a year and when I write new pages or add new photos but I do get behind. We are all a work in progress. 🙂

 

Please leave a comment. I would like to hear from you.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.